Critical Flaws Highlighted in Xiaomi SU7: 8 Reasons for Concern

Xiaomi's much-anticipated SU7, touted as a game-changer in the automotive industry, has hit a series of roadblocks as critical flaws come to light. Despite its promises of innovation and affordability, the vehicle's design and performance have drawn sharp criticism, raising concerns about safety and reliability.

Eight Flaws in Xiaomi SU7

1. Lack of Mechanical Emergency Switch

Key Highlights:

• SU7 was criticised for missing the emergency switch.
• Material flaws affect airbag function after collisions.
• Speedy auto parking and faulty alarm system raise security doubts.
• High launch accidents, paint peeling, and track crashes expose safety lapses.

One glaring omission in the SU7 is the absence of a mechanical emergency switch, a standard feature in most vehicles. With only an electronic switch in place, rescue operations become challenging in the event of a collision where occupants are rendered unconscious.

2. Poor Material Quality and Airbag Performance

Reports indicate substandard materials used in the SU7, leading to compromised airbag functionality post-collision. This flaw poses significant risks to passenger safety, as the airbags may fail to deploy effectively when needed most.

3. Issues with Auto Parking and Alarm System

The SU7's auto parking feature has been marred by excessive speed, resulting in damages, while the alarm system exhibits unreliability. These shortcomings undermine the vehicle's convenience and security aspects, warranting immediate attention.

4. Brake Problems and Handling Issues

Users have reported difficulties in braking due to undersized brake pads, exacerbating concerns about emergency braking capabilities. Additionally, the SU7 demonstrates instability and drift during turns, raising questions about its safety features and handling mechanisms.

5. High Accident Rate at Launch

Amidst its initial launch, the SU7 faced a surge in accidents, attributed to a disproportionate focus on marketing rather than addressing inherent design flaws. This alarming trend underscores the urgency for comprehensive safety assessments.

6. Corrosion-Resistant Paint Failure

Despite claims of a 12-year corrosion-proof paint job, the SU7's paint has begun peeling within days of purchase, casting doubts on the vehicle's durability and long-term quality.

7. Inadequate Soundproofing

To cut costs, Xiaomi opted against double-layered soundproof glass, resulting in excessive noise levels at higher speeds. This compromise in comfort undermines the driving experience and reflects a disregard for passenger comfort.

8. Performance Issues on Track and Road

In a concerning turn of events, the SU7 experienced multiple crashes during testing at the Tianma mountain circuit, highlighting performance inadequacies even under normal driving conditions. These incidents raise significant doubts about the vehicle's overall safety and reliability.

Carbike360 Says

The litany of issues plaguing the Xiaomi SU7 underscores the importance of prioritising safety and quality in automotive design. As consumers voice their concerns and regulatory bodies scrutinise its performance, Xiaomi faces a pivotal moment in rectifying these shortcomings and restoring trust in its brand.